How to value a logo
Mar 31, 2015
I recognized that people in need of a logo often feel a little bit confused to pay more than expected for something that looks pretty simple at first. I set this post up to justify the costs and to explain some logo 101.
The truth about even the simplest logo is that it radiates values. A good logo should be recognizable and inspires trust, admiration, and loyalty. It’s a unique visual identifier and therefore pretty crucial to a brand’s recognition.
To craft such an identifier, a designer needs to ask the following questions:
Is the logo simple enough?
Is the logo memorable?
Is the logo enduring?
Is the logo versatile enough?
Is the logo appropriate?
Let me explain these points in detail:
Simple logos are often easily recognized, incredibly memorable and the most effective in conveying the requirements of the client. The most successful brands in the world run with a simple logo.
An effective logo design is memorable. That can be achieved by having not only a simple logo but also an appropriate one. Nevertheless, there might be some situations or branding strategies where the logo can be entirely inappropriate to appear more memorable.
A good logo should not follow any trends. Did you see the Pepsi vs. CocaCola comparison? CocaCola ran with almost the same logo since the beginning of the 90s and adjusted it slightly over time. Pepsi seemed not to be pretty satisfied with their versions in the past which resulted in many different iterations. This comparison shows how a logo can transport subconsciously values: The winner of trust and loyalty is CocaCola.
A logo should work across different mediums and sizes without losing its effectivity. It should still work when it is:
set in one color
resized to a tiny piece
resized to a large piece
displayed with reversed colors (i.e., light logo on dark background)
Versatility assures that the logo remains flexible and will work for use-cases you might not even think of yet.
A logo design should be suitable for its intended purpose: This means that the logo should support the overall branding strategy of the product, company or individual. For example, a law firm’s logo should look more severe than a logo for a festival. Here are some pretty inappropriate examples.
Appropriate means not that the logo needs to show what a brand does. The Apple logo does not show a computer nor does the Nike logo show a sneaker. A logo is more an identifier like a fingerprint.
The designer needs to find out the client’s ideals and beliefs and incorporate these aspects into his/her design process while inheriting the principles described above. All in all, this is a time-intensive puzzle and a lot of work. However, a logo is always tied to the quality of the company it represents:
"If a company is second rate, the logo will eventually be perceived as second rate. It is foolhardy to believe that a logo will do its job immediately, before an audience has been properly conditioned." Paul Rand